When I was growing up there was a popular advert for chips that featured a young girl who was asked by her older sister whether she preferred Daddy or chips. It’s probably indicative of the power of advertising that I now think of that advert whenever such comparisons are made. The comparison in question here, however, is one of slightly more importance. You see, a new study from Cornell University is asking whether people would prefer a highly paid job that demanded very long hours, or better work/life balance but with less pay.
This topic is not a new one. Indeed Nobel Laureate Daniel Kahneman suggested only last year that all we really need is $75,000 a year, over which any extra money adds nothing to our perception of happiness.
When The New York Times spoke with Kahneman about the study, he said “it’s not so much that money buys you happiness, but that lack of money buys you misery.”
So the Cornell paper goes against a pretty powerful opponent, with others such as Dan Pink also proposing that money comes quite a way down the list of things that motivate us. PricewaterhouseCooper added to the mix last year by suggesting that people would forgo their bonuses in return for more flexible working.
Let’s investigate the Cornell study
They asked more than 2,600 people to consider whether being paid $150,000 with long hours (just 6 hours sleep) would make them happier than an $80,000 job that allowed them 7.5 hours sleep. Framed in that way it’s perhaps not surprising that people would gladly trade $70,000 extra per year for an hours less sleep per night.
“On average, there are systematic differences between what people choose and what people think would make them happier,” the author says. “For example, people are more likely to choose the higher-income/lower-sleep job even when they don’t think it will make them happier.” The authors “wanted to see if people were trying to be as happy as possible.”
It would be interesting to see what the responses would be, however, if the choices were slightly more realistic. For instance would an extra few thousand per year be enough for people to trade in their beauty sleep?
Ask yourself, how important is salary to your own happiness?
Posted in Compensation, Employee Engagement, Employee Retention, Exclusive Content, Featured, General Human Resources | 6 Comments »
Few thousand extras might seem glittering initially, once we start pushing ourselves and get pressured under work, we tend to loose work life balance and suffer a lot than what we earn. At the end, what is important is “the things makes/keeps us happy”
Posted on 2. November 2011 at 01:43
I think you’re right Praveen, but it’s interesting nonetheless to see just where that line is drawn. When does a little extra income become a bad thing? How much would it be for you?
Posted on 2. November 2011 at 01:49
Can you please provide a link to the Cornell Study. You mention the Author, but do not list his/her name. thank you.
Posted on 8. November 2011 at 09:31
Hi Angela,
Here you are http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1896182
Posted on 8. November 2011 at 09:44
Yap I will always prefer salary. Without salary how could I maintain my monthly expenditure.
In general HRM sense salary need every employee.
Posted on 21. November 2011 at 23:48
Everything is very open with a really clear explanation of the challenges.
It was truly informative. Your website is very
helpful. Thank you for sharing!
Posted on 24. December 2012 at 12:07